To reports the most ommitted segment and events specially those threatening humanity
What belief?
Published on March 27, 2006 By Major Maths In Religion

The erroneous beliefs of Buddhism vary greatly from country to country, because over the past 2500 years, this religion has mingled with the various local religions, customs, and established cultures of countries into which it has spread. Today, the varieties of Buddhism practiced in Japan, China, Tibet, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and America are all quite different from one another.


In Tibet, the dissemination of Buddhist texts is one of the most important acts of worship. In particular, priests who have removed themselves from the world completely give themselves solely to this work. With no idea of the true nature of the afterlife, these people live out their worldly lives in vain pursuits.

As historical sources show, Buddha always chose to speak about his basic tenets and deliver his way of worship orally; centuries of research has determined that he left behind no written texts. Buddhists maintain that his sermons were passed down orally from generation to generation for 400 years, until they were finally compiled in the Pali canon. However, most scholars believe that the great majority of these words are not Buddha's at all, but were added to in the course of centuries until they attained their present form. Therefore Buddhism, not relying on any written texts, underwent many changes and distortions over the course of time, being considerably reshaped by additions and omissions.

Today, Buddhism's holy book, written in the Pali language, is called the Tipitaka, which means "triple basket." It is not known for sure when the Tipitaka was written down, but it is thought to have attained its present shape in Sri Lanka sometime in the first century B.C. Its texts are divided into the following chapters:

1. Vinaya Pitaka: This chapter, meaning "Basket of Discipline," contains rules relevant to priests and nuns and how they should be followed. There are also some matters of relevance to those lay readers who are not priests or nuns.

2. Sutta Pitaka: Most of this volume is composed of talks in which Buddha explained his ideas. For this reason, this chapter is called the "Basket of Discourse." These words of his were passed down through the centuries, becoming mixed with other legends and false beliefs.

3. Abhidhamma Pitaka: This volume contains Buddhist philosophy and interpretations of Buddha's sermons.

Today's Buddhist priests regard these texts as holy; they worship and organize their lives according to them. They portray Buddha as an actual god (God is surely beyond that!), and for this reason, modern Buddhists bow before his statues, place before them offerings of food and flowers, and expect help from them. This is a completely illogical practice, however, and anyone who believes that stone or bronze statues can hear or help is greatly deceived. Later in this book, we examine these basically pagan practices in more detail, and see how Buddhism has become a secret doctrine concentrating on human beings without accounting for questions of how this world's flawless systems function, much less how the entire universe came to be.


Throughout the centuries, libraries in Tibet have been destroyed. But handwritten books by Tibetan priests are still preserved in neighboring regions. All this Buddhist literature leads people to lead a nightmarish life. This perverse and benighted religion claims that after they die, people might come back as a cow or a mouse and condemns them to lives of fear and anxiety.



Comments
on Mar 27, 2006
To Quoth: They portray Buddha as an actual god (God is surely beyond that!),

Would you say the same thing about Christians who believed that Jesus was god as well? A nightmarish life? How so? What is worse, dying inthe flames of hell for all eternity or coming back as a crow?

I appreciate your questions, but perhaps you need to study some other Buddhist texts for a more compassionate perspective on Buddhism.

- Shalom, Moskowitz
on Mar 27, 2006

Why does Buddhism disgust you so?  It seems to me that you're slightly obsessed with it.

FYI, we're not people of the book.  Yes, they're there, and yes, they have valuable information in them, but we don't go around quoting the Dhammapada - we don't say 'In sutra number forty-two, verse 11 it says...'...it's not like that.

This whole subject is causing me samsara, therefore I won't be responding any further.  I think that you'll find a lot of other bloggers feel the same way.....you're on the verge of being written off as a kook.

on Mar 27, 2006
"This perverse and benighted religion claims that after they die, people might come back as a cow or a mouse and condemns them to lives of fear and anxiety."


As opposed to telling them they might burn eternally in Hell, suffering the worst possible pain and anquish for eternity. Yeah, being a cow would cause people much more worry and anquish, I'm sure.
on Mar 27, 2006
This perverse and benighted religion claims that after they die, people might come back as a cow or a mouse and condemns them to lives of fear and anxiety


Are you sure you're not thinking of Hinduism?

Baker: HAHAHAH! You just get funnier!
on Mar 27, 2006
Just as a side note, the erroneous beliefs of Christianity vary just as greatly.
on Mar 27, 2006
The erroneous beliefs of Buddhism vary greatly from country to country, because over the past 2500 years, this religion has mingled with the various local religions, customs, and established cultures of countries into which it has spread. Today, the varieties of Buddhism practiced in Japan, China, Tibet, Sri Lanka, Vietnam and America are all quite different from one another.


What point are you making? Christianity has undergone massive transition in the last 2000 years. There are hundreds of different christian doctrines, and they even differ from person to person. Does that make its beliefs erroneous? And what of the first 5 books of the bible? Christians claim they were revealed to Moses by god - doesnt that take just as much faith as believing the faithful followers of buddha preserved his words? Muhammad was illiterate and memorized the verses of the Koran for years before some of his followers began to write them down. Does this make the Koran false? Every religion, even being atheist requires some bit of faith. Consider your own faith and the faiths of others before you lash out at buddism - intolerant ignorant christians are one of the greatest casues of atheism today.


on Mar 27, 2006
It seems to me that you're slightly obsessed with it.


ya, I'm agreeing here with Dharma. Why all the interest in just this one religion? Why not write on the JW's, Hindu's Baha'i, Mormons, Swedenborgism, etc? Why are you picking just on the Buddhists? Were you a former follower?

As opposed to telling them they might burn eternally in Hell, suffering the worst possible pain and anquish for eternity. Yeah, being a cow would cause people much more worry and anquish, I'm sure.


I believe in Hell, and believe that it will be crowded but I don't necessarily believe one will be burning in it. Burning consumes and I don't believe this will happen.
on Mar 28, 2006
Buddhism isn't a religion. I think most people plop it into that category for lack of knowledge on the subject and lack of ability to put it anywhere else. For me, it's a lot closer to philosophy, but there are a lot of physics involved too. I like to think of it as where physics meets philosophy.

At any rate, discussing Buddhism as a religion will always fail as it is comparing apples to oranges. Any Buddhist will tell you that Buddha himself denied any sort of deity status - that sort of defeats the point of worship and Gods. If some group of Buddhists somewhere has decided Buddha is a God, then that's their trip. I'm a buddhist and I haven't, and that's mine. The OP here has his idea of what Buddhism is, and guess what sports fans? That's okie dokie with Buddhists In the world's coloring book, he is free to color inside the lines, outside the lines, or to tear the book in half.

Anyone that ever spends anytime with buddhism will find that the Buddha's approach to life was based on all the logic he could bring to bear on his perceptions and the interaction between his senses and the objects they sensed. Whether he succeeded or failed is irrelevant to me. He made the best attempt he could to let pure reason be his guide in life over fairy tales, rationalizations, and conjecture. I'm down with that.
on Mar 28, 2006
Double posted somehow. Please feel free to delete this one.